Sunday, December 27, 2020

Goodbye 2020. Hello 2021.

2020 has been a different year. And that's the kindest version to describe the year. And misquoting the popular phrase, When you're at the bottom, there's no where else to go but up. So 2021 is looking really good right now.

 

And in keeping with 2020 being different, my resolutions this year are also different. And my communication of them is also different.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Yep. No one will know what they are. Until the end of 2021. :)

Have a wonderful 2021 and my hope is that it'll be significantly better than 2020.

Happy & Prosperous 2021 !

p.s.: Its a real list. And not a Con as most of 2020 seems to have been. :))

Sunday, December 20, 2020

mRNA

mRNA is unbelievably fascinating. Given that many of the COVID-19 vaccines are using this technology, its a good time to know more about this amazing technology. And how it could impact health care for several decades.


This YouTube video by a doctor explains how mRNA works as well as the vaccines and their efficacy.

DOCTOR EXPLAINS mRNA COVID-19 VACCINE

 

Ironically this talk from 2013 becomes extremely interesting and relevant.

Biology dogma: DNA -- mRNA -- proteins. The biotech industry has made wonders for patients in the last 30 years making recombinant proteins, like EPO and insulin. What if mRNA could be a drug and the body could make its own missing proteins on demand?

Stephane Bancel is the founding CEO of moderna Therapeutics in Cambridge, MA.

What if mRNA could be a drug?
Stephane Bancel

TEDxBeaconStreet


 

Sunday, December 13, 2020

Indian Farmers Agitation

A few friends and family have been sending articles and videos on social media platforms regarding the farmers agitation. Most of these are NRI's (Non Resident Indians) and most of the articles paint a one sided picture of the evil government and exploitive farm laws on one side and the poor downtrodden farmer on the other.

250 million Indian workers and farmers strike, breaking world record


https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/250-million-indian-workers-and-farmers-strike-breaking-world-record/


Unfortunately most of those who forward these articles have not bothered to read the farm laws or even articles on the subject.

For those who are interested in understanding the issue and why it's not as simple as some of the media, especially Western media is making it out to be, I've given below several links to Wikipedia and articles that provide a balanced view on the subject. The Good. The Bad. And the Ugly.


To summarize there were 3 farm laws that were passed by the Indian Parliament in September 2020.

2020 Indian farmers' protest
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Indian_farmers%27_protest

1.
Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020
https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15513/1/A2020_21.pdf

2.
Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020
https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15511/1/A2020_20.pdf

3.
Essential Commodities Act
https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1579/1/A1955_10.pdf

Impact of India’s New Farm Act, 2020 on Farmers and Markets
Jyoti Prakash Sahoo, Kailash Chandra Samal and Dibakar Behe
ra

Introduction
In the midst of strong protests from opposition members over their demand for a division of votes on their motion to refer the legislation to a select committee, the Rajya Sabha has passed two primary farm bills. The Upper House passed the Farmer’s Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Bill, 2020, by voice vote, and the Price Guarantee and Farm Services Bill Agreement for Farmers (Empowerment and Protection), 2020. The bills have already been passed by Lok Sabha and have now been informed on 27th September, 2020 as legislation. On the other hand, contract farming legislation would enable farmers to enter into a pre-agreed price contract with agribusiness companies or large retailers for their goods. This will assist small and marginal farmers as the law will move from the farmer to the sponsor the risk of market unpredictability. The 2020 Essential Commodities (Amendment) Bill seeks to delete the list of essential commodities such as cereals, pulses, oilseeds, edible oils, onions and potatoes. It implies that, except in exceptional circumstances such as war and natural calamities, the law would do away with the imposition of stock-holding limits on such products.

...


Conclusion
Some politicians claim the solution is government purchase of all farm produce at a high price. Global experience shows, however, that if the government- guaranteed price is above international levels, this will cause a surplus for which domestic or foreign demand is not present. High farm support prices were used by the European Union, which produced mountains of unsold meat and butter and lakes of milk, which were eventually sold to the Soviet Union at a huge loss. The EU has now shifted mainly to direct farmers’ income support. With Telangana’s Rythu Bandhu scheme (Rs. 10,000.00 per acre) and Modi’s PM- Kisan scheme (Rs. 6,000.00 per acre), India is moving in a similar direction. The best is Odisha’s KALIYA, which not only provides landowners but also tenants and shareholders with cash transfers (Rs. 10,000.00 per acre); Rs. 12,500.00 to landless households to start poultry, goat-rearing and fisheries; Rs. 25,000.00 over five years to purchase inputs for small and marginal farmers; and insurance benefits. In short, in the meantime, farmers need freedom to sell, move out of farming, and cash support rather than high prices and the new farm act will help the Indian farmers.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344508649_Impact_of_India%27s_New_Farm_Act_2020_on_Farmers_and_Markets/link/5f7d6dfda6fdccfd7b4ca7d1/download


Protesting farmers are arguing for the perpetuation of colonial rule
Surjit S Bhalla


A minuscule minority of farmers is protesting against the farm laws. They don’t want an end to the system that has benefited them.

"...

A little detail on these bills: The old farm produce laws (the creation of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) came into existence almost 150 years ago to feed the colonial masters raw cotton for their Manchester mills. The output of these mills was then sold to the “natives” for a hefty profit. The farmer was obligated, required, forced to sell to the masters in a regulated market whose regulation was set by, you guessed it, the colonial masters. It is very likely that the people blindly supporting the “poor” farmers (who were recently seen distributing expensive dry fruit freely to all those coming to their “protest”) are unaware of some simple facts. By supporting these very (relatively) rich farmers, the protesters are in fact arguing for the perpetuation of colonial rule.

Some steps further in this historical lesson. The corrosive monopoly power held by the APMCs has been recognised by almost all political parties and farmer unions (for example, the Bharat Kisan Union took out a protest in 2008 arguing for the right of farmers to sell produce to corporates). The Congress party had these very same laws in its 2019 election manifesto.

Let us further follow this chain of logic of the farm protest supporters. In 1991, the government freed industry from its cage and the results are there for everybody to see, and applaud (except, of course, the wilfully blind). GDP growth in India doubled to an average of 6 per cent over the next 30 years, from the previous average of less than 3 per cent.

For reasons best known to the “political” economists, agriculture was not freed in 1991, or thereafter — until now. Farmers are forced to sell their marketable produce only through a mandi regulated by the government. The new reformed law allows the farmer to sell through the APMC, and to sell outside the APMC. It is her choice. The government procures all of its food through APMCs — only about 6 per cent of the farmers in India sell through the APMCs to the government. These 6 per cent are all large farmers, primarily residing in the two states of Punjab and Haryana. These two states typically account for close to 60 per cent of wheat procurement and close to a third of rice procurement. The government procures from these farmers in order to re-distribute the food via ration shops to the bottom two-thirds of the population. But there are leakages. This leakage was first openly discussed by former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1985 when he stated that only 15 per cent of the food procured by the government reached the poor.

There are no more than two million farmers — total — in Punjab and Haryana and less than 5 per cent have holdings above 10 hectares. A rough back of the envelope calculation suggests that the protesting farmers from Punjab and Haryana total no more than 200,000 — that is two hundred thousand so there is no confusion with numbers. The number of all farmers in India, very small, small and large is 100 million. So about 0.2 per cent of all farmers in India have “reason” to protest. And what are they protesting for? Likely the licence to remain the richest farmers in India or the world because in addition to the exclusive APMC largesse, the income of these farmers is not taxed. The non-taxation of agricultural incomes does not benefit the poor farmer because she does not have enough income to be taxed.

 

Be honest — how many of you know a law in any of the 195 out of 200 countries in the world that prohibit an individual from selling her wares in the market? Count the countless street vendors in the world, in both developing and developed markets. Are they prohibited from selling who they want to sell to? Then why the demand that the APMC be the sole buyer for all farmers?

..."

https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/farmers-protest-agri-laws-apmc-mandis-msp-surjit-bhalla-7101406/


And for those who would like the issue broken down in a simple manner on video, here's one from Faye D'Souza who explains the issue well.

Farmers Protest Explained
Faye D'Souza



My personal opinion based on all of the reading that's available in the public domain as well as the laws themselves is that there are several issues in the laws that need to be modified.

A major one being that the parties cannot approach the courts and that the government bureaucrats decision on issues will be final and binding.

However the laws themselves have a good intent and is a major step forward towards reforms and progress for farmers and the country and should be retained.

While several grievance of the farmers are genuine, many of them are driven by politics and to ensure that a minority of rich farmers and middle men do not lose their lucrative income which is mainly at the cost of the tax payer and the smaller farmers.

A friend of mine who is himself a farmer summarized it well:
"Most of us here feel that the 3 las should stay. Amendments keep taking place later on but scrapping the laws will be a step backwards."


 

Sunday, December 6, 2020

Question yourself

As we enter the final month of 2020, I like many of us have been introspecting about the year behind us and more importantly about the year ahead. And a good way is to question yourself.

And Stacey Abrams, one of the primary heroes of the 2020 presidential elections (IMO), has this brilliant talk on the subject.


3 questions to ask yourself about everything you do
Stacey Abrams

How you respond to setbacks is what defines your character, says Stacey Abrams, the first Black woman in the history of the United States to be nominated by a major party for governor. In an electrifying talk, she shares the lessons she learned from her campaign for governor of Georgia -- and some advice on how to change the world. "Be aggressive about your ambition," Abrams says.


Sunday, November 29, 2020

Delivered Happiness : RIP Tony Hsieh

A few years ago, Reia recommended that I read a book, "Delivering Happiness". I did. And it was very good. It had several non-conventional approaches and philosophies, all of which were proven to work by the books author, Tony Hsieh.


On Friday, November 27, Tony Hsieh passed away at the age of 46. The last few years of his life were troubled. He died following a fire accident in a friends home in Connecticut.

His final years in no way diminishes the amazing person that he was. And the millions of people he inspired to deliver happiness, including one of his biggest fans, Reia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Hsieh


From 2010: Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh
CBS Sunday Morning

Tony Hsieh, the retired head of Las Vegas-based Zappos.com, died Friday, November 27. In this profile that originally aired on "Sunday Morning" June 6, 2010, correspondent Erin Moriarty talked with the then-36-year-old CEO whose online shoe retailer was thriving, thanks in part to a unique company culture and its revolutionary customer service. Hsieh also discussed a business philosophy he wrote about in his book, "Delivering Happiness: A Path to Profits, Passion, and Purpose."


And this talk by Tony captures him as Reia and all of us remember. An inspirational icon.


Zappos' Hsieh: Building a Formidable Brand
Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh offers a compelling account of his transformation from callow Harvard student entrepreneur through his years as a dot-com wunderkind to the creator of a formidable brand.


Sunday, November 22, 2020

Impostor Syndrome

I'm always afraid that I'm not good enough in most settings. And am secretly envious when others seem so confident and sure of themselves even when its obvious that they know very little and a lot of what they're saying is for want of a better word, "BS".

So it was with relief that I found that this is true for many people. And I could heave a sign of relief.


"Have you ever doubted your abilities, feared you were going to be discovered as a "fraud"? That's called "impostor syndrome," and you're definitely not alone in feeling it, says entrepreneur and CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes. In this funny, relatable talk, he shares how his own experiences of impostor syndrome helped pave the way to his success -- and shows how you can use it to your advantage, too."

How you can use impostor syndrome to your benefit
Mike Cannon-Brookes

 "Even after writing eleven books and winning several awards, Maya Angelou couldn't escape the doubt that she hadn't earned her accomplishments. This feeling of fraudulence is extremely common. Why can't so many of us shake feelings that our ideas and skills aren't worthy of others' attention? Elizabeth Cox describes the psychology behind the imposter syndrome, and what you can do to combat it."

What is impostor syndrome and how can you combat it?
Elizabeth Cox



And here's an interesting article that may help sort out some of the issues or at the very least provide some guidelines.
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/are-you-suffering-from-impostor-syndrome/


Sunday, November 15, 2020

The 3 minutes Secrets of Success

Success is what we all strive for. And one is always looking for ways to increase the probability of succeeding. Over 8 years ago, I wrote a blog on "Secrets of Success". I just checked it out and it was pretty good. I think.

Secrets of Success
https://lobodecoded.blogspot.com/2012/03/secrets-of-success.html

I'm a huge fan of the "Crash Course" and "Short cuts". And so when I saw this 3 minute recipe for success, I couldn't resist. I'm glad I didn't. Check it out.

"
Why do people succeed? Is it because they're smart? Or are they just lucky? Neither. Analyst Richard St. John condenses years of interviews into an unmissable 3-minute slideshow on the real secrets of success.
"

8 secrets of success
Richard St. John
Marketer, Success Analyst




Sunday, November 8, 2020

Philosophy of success

A large part of our life is chasing success. And most times we have no idea of what success is. And when will we be pleased with the success we may have achieved.

And I'm a sucker for anyone who has a kinder, gentler interpretation of success.

"
Alain de Botton examines our ideas of success and failure -- and questions the assumptions underlying these two judgments. Is success always earned? Is failure? He makes an eloquent, witty case to move beyond snobbery to find true pleasure in our work.
"

A kinder, gentler philosophy of success
Alain de Botton
Philosopher




Sunday, November 1, 2020

Getting what you want...

Getting what you want is Simple. And who doesn't want to get what they want.

It was quite interesting. Check it out. At the very least it'll get you to think a little.


"
How do you get on the road to being happier? Start by setting your alarm for 30 minutes earlier than usual and not hitting the snooze button. The effort required to leave that warm bed and enter the world is the same amount of effort needed to shake up your life and make that elusive change. In this humorous and provocative talk, Mel Robbins explains how turning off our brain's autopilot and demolishing our comfort zones is key to a rewarding life.
"

How to stop screwing yourself over
Mel Robbins
Author


 

Sunday, October 25, 2020

Define your fears

We all have ups and downs. Its the downs that many os us have no good way to handle. This talk provides a few thoughts that may be helpful.

"
The hard choices -- what we most fear doing, asking, saying -- are very often exactly what we need to do. How can we overcome self-paralysis and take action? Tim Ferriss encourages us to fully envision and write down our fears in detail, in a simple but powerful exercise he calls "fear-setting." Learn more about how this practice can help you thrive in high-stress environments and separate what you can control from what you cannot.
"

Why you should define your fears instead of your goals
Tim Ferriss
Investor, Author



Sunday, October 18, 2020

Need a new idea?

I'm stuck. And need an idea. A new idea. This happens regularly. And I struggle. As possibly many of us do.

And when a leading physicist offers to help answer the question, are you supposed that I jumped into it. And encourage you to check it out too.

"
"Where do great ideas come from?" Starting with this question in mind, Vittorio Loreto takes us on a journey to explore a possible mathematical scheme that explains the birth of the new. Learn more about the "adjacent possible" -- the crossroads of what's actual and what's possible -- and how studying the math that drives it could explain how we create new ideas.
"

Need a new idea? Start at the edge of what is known
Vittorio Loreto
Physicist


Sunday, October 11, 2020

Explain explanation

I often struggle with explanations. Especially Explaining. The one method I kind of likes was what Reia used as a child. And thinking of it, still does. She makes statements. And when you ask Why?, she'd promptly reply, "Why because!", and treat the matter as proven and closed.

And recently when I cam across "A new way to explain explanation" I was intrigued. And since I watched it, it is but fair that you do too. And for those who want to know Why; Isn't it obvious? Why, because !


"
For tens of thousands of years our ancestors understood the world through myths, and the pace of change was glacial. The rise of scientific understanding transformed the world within a few centuries. Why? Physicist David Deutsch proposes a subtle answer.
"

A new way to explain explanation
David Deutsch
Physicist, Author


And for the record, I think I'm going to try Reia's method again. Easier and simpler. And possibly more effective.

Sunday, October 4, 2020

How racial bias works ...

In the last couple of years, I've realized how serious the issue of racial bias is and how little I knew on the subject. This has led me to be more aware and conscious.

A talk on this subject by Jennifer L. Eberhardt led me to reflect on my unconscious biases. Some of the ideas given can be used by us.


How racial bias works - and how to disrupt it
Jennifer L. Eberhardt

Our brains create categories to make sense of the world, recognize patterns and make quick decisions. But this ability to categorize also exacts a heavy toll in the form of unconscious bias. In this powerful talk, psychologist Jennifer L. Eberhardt explores how our biases unfairly target Black people at all levels of society -- from schools and social media to policing and criminal justice -- and discusses how creating points of friction can help us actively interrupt and address this troubling problem.


 

Sunday, September 27, 2020

anti-CEO


I'm convinced. If I get an opportunity, I'd love to use Hamdi Ulukaya's playbook.

The anti-CEO playbook
Hamdi Ulukaya

Profit, money, shareholders: these are the priorities of most companies today. But at what cost? In an appeal to corporate leaders worldwide, Chobani founder Hamdi Ulukaya calls for an end to the business playbook of the past -- and shares his vision for a new, "anti-CEO playbook" that prioritizes people over profits. "This is the difference between profit and true wealth," he says.

Sunday, September 20, 2020

How will humans evolve. In 100 years.

While the world changes quickly around us, we wonder whether the human will also evolve. And how.

In small ways, we have been evolving. We have pacemakers and prosthetics and hearing aids, and ... What's likely to be different is "need" v/s "Wants". Most of the current evolution is to become closer to normal. We already have non-medical necessity enhancements, like botox, beauty plastic surgery, ...

And we're close to this becoming a lifestyle choice for those who can afford it.

Futurist Juan Enriques discusses this ethical quandary.

What will humans look like in 100 years?
Juan Enriquez


We can evolve bacteria, plants and animals -- futurist Juan Enriquez asks: Is it ethical to evolve the human body? In a visionary talk that ranges from medieval prosthetics to present day neuroengineering and genetics, Enriquez sorts out the ethics associated with evolving humans and imagines the ways we'll have to transform our own bodies if we hope to explore and live in places other than Earth.

Sunday, September 13, 2020

Winning an argument

I've always thought that I was good at logic and am able to make powerful arguments based on logic. However in the last few years, I've found that on many if not most occasions, inspire of the argument being solid and valid, it doesn't seem to move the needle on the other side.

And while I don't think this talk on winning arguments is likely to change my recent poor record, it does give an interesting insight and hope.

"... And I've realized the question is not how to win every argument. It's how to get back up when you do lose. Because in the long run, good arguments will win out."

How to win an argument (at the US Supreme Court, or anywhere)
Neal Katyal


The secret to winning an argument isn't grand rhetoric or elegant style, says US Supreme Court litigator Neal Katyal -- it takes more than that. With stories of some of the most impactful cases he's argued before the Court, Katyal shows why the key to crafting a persuasive and successful argument lies in human connection, empathy and faith in the power of your ideas. "The question is not how to win every argument," he says. "It's how to get back up when you do lose."




Sunday, September 6, 2020

Classical music

My wife thinks I'm tone deaf. And its one of the things that I don't disagree with her.

Until today. When I heard this line

"So I'm going to go on until every single person in this room, downstairs and in Aspen, and everybody else looking, will come to love and understand classical music. So that's what we're going to do."

And I had hope.

The transformative power of classical music
Benjamin Zander

 


Sunday, August 30, 2020

Perceptions about Science

It seems strange to talk about science and perceptions in the same sentence. I've always believed that science is based on the latest knowledge and there cannot be difference of opinions on the subject. The experts discuss and come u with what is widely accepted as scientific fact.

And yet, today there's multiple views on what seems to me to be indisputable science. And yet even something like Climate Change which is undisputed in the scientific world has almost half of non scientists disagree. And this is where perceptions about science.

This talk by Dr. J. Marshall Shepherd shows why this happens. And listening will give an appreciation not only of why this happens but also give an insight that may lead to changing some of the perception we hold, albeit unknowingly.

3 kinds of bias that shape your worldview
Dr. J. Marshall Shepherd

What shapes our perceptions (and misperceptions) about science? In an eye-opening talk, meteorologist J. Marshall Shepherd explains how confirmation bias, the Dunning-Kruger effect and cognitive dissonance impact what we think we know -- and shares ideas for how we can replace them with something much more powerful: knowledge.  



Sunday, August 23, 2020

Finding free time

Lately, coming to think of it, always, I never seem to find time to do what I consider important things. And yet seem to find time to do thing I like. Such as watching TV.

I've been trying to find ways to find time. And then I came across this talk. Where "Laura Vanderkam shatters the myth that there just isn’t enough time in the week for working professionals to live happy, balanced and productive lives."

And this line from the talk stood out as so true, "We don't build the lives we want by saving time. We build the lives we want, and then time saves itself."

How to gain control of your free time
Laura Vanderkam


There are 168 hours in each week. How do we find time for what matters most? Time management expert Laura Vanderkam studies how busy people spend their lives, and she's discovered that many of us drastically overestimate our commitments each week, while underestimating the time we have to ourselves. She offers a few practical strategies to help find more time for what matters to us, so we can "build the lives we want in the time we've got."


Sunday, August 16, 2020

Raymond Loewy - The Father of Industrial Design

I first heard of Raymond Loewy last week in the "MAYA" talk by Derek Thomson who credited Loewy with MAYA.


Naturally, I was intrigued and wanted to find out more. I'm sure you too will love knowing more about the man and his work.


Raymond Loewy, Father of Industrial Design
a CBS News Presentation, 1979




 

Designed Different- Raymond Loewy

One of the greatest minds of the 20th Century, Raymond Loewy the father of Streamline design, from the Cold Spot refrigerator to Sky Lab, his design was everywhere. He's most remembered for the amazing car designs he fostered. Dub version of 20th Century Fox propels us through this cavalcade of genius.




Sunday, August 9, 2020

MAYA - Most Advanced Yet Acceptable

In anything new we do we often ask ourselves, whether our audience will like it. Will it be popular and most importantly Is there a formula for popularity, that can be used during the creation process.

And while intuitively it seemed like that there probably are some patterns I was surprised that there's an answer to "Why do we like what we like?"

The four-letter code to selling anything
Derek Thompson

Why do we like what we like? Raymond Loewy, the father of industrial design, had a theory. He was the all-star 20th-century designer of the Coca-Cola fountain and Lucky Strike pack; the modern sports car, locomotive, Greyhound bus and tractor; the interior of the first NASA spaceship; and the egg-shaped pencil sharpener. How did one man understand what consumers wanted from so many different areas of life? His grand theory of popularity was called MAYA: Most advanced yet acceptable. He said humans are torn between two opposing forces: neophilia, a love of new things; and neophobia; a fear of anything that’s too new. Hits, he said, live at the perfect intersection of novelty and familiarity. They are familiar surprises. In this talk, I’ll explain how Loewy’s theory has been validated by hundreds of years of research — and how we can all use it to make hits.


Sunday, August 2, 2020

Fact or Fake ?

In the last few weeks in the midst of a pandemic, I've been amazed by people disbelieving what I thought was obvious. And backed by almost all countries, scientists, doctors, ... Not only that, they had arguments as to how all of those people were wrong and they were right. That's because some of them had originally had another opinion and ow changed it. So no one knew anything. And Yet, somehow they did. Many of these were in my mind intelligent, rational people in almost every aspect of their lives. Except when it came to objectively make decisions which had a political or religious tinge to it. And while they all maintained that they were objective, they were mostly unable to cite any data and mostly based their thinking on either partisan television or radio or social media. I was baffled. How can this happen.


It seemed like the fountain of all knowledge is also the fountain of ignorance. You can find almost every belief you want. And even when you have no beliefs, based on your leanings, the ubiquitous search engines will find you things that map to your way of thinking.

The question is how interested are you in learning the facts or the truth. If you are, you can find it relatively easily by ensuring that the source of you data is non-partisan and has no agenda. Another way of ensuring that the data you are using is by checking out the data provided by both sides and coming to your own conclusion. Typically partisan media will use selective data to try to make their point. Expanding the selection and ignoring the conclusions while making your own almost always leads you to the objective truth. And only if you objectively without any firm opinions and with a willingness to change them based on the data.



Two very interesting talks gives an insight into our behavior, our thinking and our illusions.

Why do we believe things that aren't true?
Philip Fernbach


It seems like we're living in an epidemic of false belief. Clearly the other side just doesn’t have all the facts, right? Or are they really that stupid? In this fascinating and hilarious talk, cognitive scientist Philip Fernbach peels back the layers of what we really know and reveals some surprising truths about the human mind.




The Knowledge Illusion
Kyle interviews Steven Sloman, Professor in the school of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences at Brown University. Steven is co-author of The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone and Causal Models: How People Think about the World and Its Alternatives. Steven shares his perspective and research into how people process information and what this teaches us about the existence of and belief in fake news.

Sunday, July 26, 2020

Living while Black !

As I'm paying attention to the Black Lives Matter, I'm coming across more and more injustices and issues that I was completely missing. The talk by Baratunde Thurston is yet another deeply moving and disturbing narrative of what many of us fail to see and appreciate.

How to deconstruct racism, one headline at a time
Baratunde Thurston explores the phenomenon of white Americans calling the police on black Americans who have committed the crimes of ... eating, walking or generally "living while black." In this profound, thought-provoking and often hilarious talk, he reveals the power of language to change stories of trauma into stories of healing -- while challenging us all to level up.


Also check out:

Check out Baratunde Thurston's website:
https://www.baratunde.com/#baratunde

Baratunde Thurston's "Living while Black" page:
https://www.baratunde.com/livingwhileblack

And a collection of "Living While Black Headlines"
https://airtable.com/shrq7t6zz5zwImq54/tblftqCxO7gcK1Ol3/viwAMSwE7vNXtV1nR?blocks=hide

Sunday, July 19, 2020

Can you be "not racist" ?

Racism is a Real Issue. And in the last few months, with all of the happenings all over the globe, and especially in the US, the issue has come to forefront.

Today, I came across a conversation with historian Ibram X Kendi. And this clarified a lot of doubts and conflicts I had about the subject in my mind. This is an important conversation to listen to. I hope you do.



The difference between being "not racist" and antiracist

There is no such thing as being "not racist," says author and historian Ibram X. Kendi. In this vital conversation, he defines the transformative concept of antiracism to help us more clearly recognize, take responsibility for and reject prejudices in our public policies, workplaces and personal beliefs. Learn how you can actively use this awareness to uproot injustice and inequality in the world -- and replace it with love. (This virtual interview, hosted by TED's current affairs curator Whitney Pennington Rodgers and speaker development curator Cloe Shasha, was recorded June 9, 2020.)



13th

This is a powerful documentary that you should definitely watch. Its now available for free viewing on YouTube for the next few months.

Filmmaker Ava DuVernay explores the history of race and the criminal justice system in the United States. The film's title refers to the 13th Amendment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krfcq5pF8u8










Sunday, July 12, 2020

Create a Podcast : It's easier than you think.

One of the things on my bucket list that I haven't got around to is having a podcast. One of the reasons is that it's not an easy thing to do. And editing the same is even more complex.

Yesterday Freia made a podcast. And then edited it. And played it for me. I was amazed. By the quality and the ease which she created a high quality podcast with a friend who was on the other side of the country. In under 3 hours.

I was intrigued. And checked what software she was using. She used 2 of them. The first to record the podcast. And the second to edit it. I checked both and they were Amazing and Cost-effective.

I hope to have my podcast published before the end of this year. Check them out. And maybe you'll be inspired to have your own podcast.




The most reliable and easy way to record your podcast remotely

  • Record your podcast's audio AND video locally.
  • Separate audio and video tracks for each guest.
  • Livestream it to YouTube/Facebook/Twitter.
  • Let your listeners call in via video.








It’s how you make a podcast.

Record. Transcribe. Edit. Mix. As easy as typing.
Take control of your podcast with Descript.


https://www.descript.com/






Sunday, July 5, 2020

Please wear a mask !

Last week I started going to office. There were notices posted regarding social distancing, wearing masks in common places, and one-way directions for movement for hallways and stairways. The building management had even put up touch free "Antimicrobial Solutions" sanitizers. However, there was minimal adoption of any of these norms, by many if not most of the office attendees.



I was and am still unable to understand how in a Society that prides itself on the rule of law and even has the highest incarceration rate in the world, the flouting of all rules and norms is taken so lightly. There seems to be denial even after over 10,000,000 cases and 500,000 deaths globally of which over 3,000,000 cases and 130,000 deaths in the US alone.


Many people seem to be in denial and assume that it's unlikely to affect them or their families. What I fail to understand is that even if this is what they think, why can't they take small precautions that in no way affect them but decrease the probability of others being affected.

We wish our fellow humans well, even strangers as we say "Good Morning", and yet we refuse to convert those words into actions.


Here's a conversation with Bill Gates. And if this even encourages 1 person to change their attitude and behavior, I'll be thrilled.


Sunday, June 28, 2020

it is what it is

On Friday evening I noticed Freia liking and retweeting tweets from an account "it is what it is".


When we spoke later I asked her what it was and she defected the question. We moved on to talk about other stuff. I didn't give this a second thought.

On Saturday morning there were a zillion tweets and articles and "it is what it is" was blowing up.

I finally figured out what a small group of young people had managed to pull off in under 36 hours.

I'll let Freia tell the story in her own words:

- Hey guys
- I worked on a fun project with my friends the last few days



 
- We made a website pretending like we made a hot new app
- And everyone in tech wanted an invite
- And we used their attention through our twitter account to raise money for a few important causes
- And we also got some big donors to match
- the whole project was done over 36 hours start to finish



And let the Team tell their story in their own words:

WHAT IT REALLY IS

JUNE 26TH, 2020

You’re probably wondering what this is. Well, it started off as just what it is.

A group of us changed our Twitter names to include "👁👄👁" because we thought it was a funny trend from TikTok. People started noticing the change on their timelines, noting the creepiness of the emojis in particular. For a brief period of time, everyone who added the emojis to their name was added to a giant Twitter group conversation. From there, things unfolded.

What started out as a meme in our small group chat grew bigger than we ever imagined. So we thought about how to make use of the hype cycle we’d stumbled upon. But honestly, we didn’t have to think too hard: in this moment, there’s pretty much no greater issue to amplify than the systemic racism and anti-Blackness much of the world is only beginning to wake up to. We’re excited that we could use our newfound platform to drive action towards a few causes that are doing important work towards racial justice: Loveland Foundation Therapy Fund, The Okra Project, The Innocence Project, and others.

We’ve done pretty well for a non-existent product. 👁👄👁.fm was the top product of the day on Product Hunt (Theranos who?). The website accumulated 20,000 email signups and thousands of tweets sharing the link. We were covered in The Independent and Forbes. We got shoutouts from Josh Constine and Brianne Kimmel. Some folks on Reddit puzzled over who we were. Andrew Chen of Andreessen Horowitz, Shannon Purser of Stranger Things, and Elon Musk may have subtweeted us? The @itiseyemoutheye Twitter and accounts of our teammates were inundated with invite requests. Most importantly, we raised over $60,000 in donations from people who hoped to get special treatment within our fabled waitlist. An anonymous donor has agreed to match the first $50,000 and we would love to work with anyone else who wants to match. Please DM us!

In a strange way, this sort of became an anti-statement against what we’d all seen on tech Twitter. We’re a diverse, ragtag group of young technologists tired of the status quo tech industry, and thought that we could make the industry think a bit more about its actions. Despite calls-to-action like that “It’s Time to Build” essay we’ve all read, most of the industry (from product teams to VC) still stays obsessed with exclusive social apps that regularly ignore — or even silence — real needs faced by marginalized people all over the world, and exclude these folks from the building process. As an industry, we need to do better.

We sincerely thank you for spreading the word and donating to these important causes. In conclusion, it is what it is: a meme that leveraged the relentless hype of exclusive apps and redirected it towards a critical social need. Thank you, and remember that unlike 👁👄👁, #BlackLivesMatter and other social movements aren't trends or hype cycles. Let’s keep giving back as best as we can.

Signed,

The 👁👄👁 Team

https://xn--mp8hai.fm/statement


And am once again giving below links to the 3 causes this amazing team supported.

https://thelovelandfoundation.org/loveland-therapy-fund/
 


https://www.theokraproject.com/
 

https://www.innocenceproject.org/

Sunday, June 21, 2020

Agree to Disagree ?

A couple of weeks ago, I was meeting a colleague in office for work on a Sunday. After we finished our meeting, we got talking. And what started quite nicely ended up not so nicely. It was Politics. He couldn't believe that what was obvious to him wasn't obvious to everybody and especially to me. And I couldn't believe how he could draw such obviously, incorrect conclusions from the available data and facts. We walked away saying See you tomorrow, while thinking Really!

And for the record, he was wrong. :)

I decided as I have done 100's of times in the past never to discuss Politics and Religion. He sent me an article that he thought proved his point. I went through it and found it had no merit. I started writing a long response, but then thought it would be counterproductive and felt it was better to not respond. And the issue would die a natural death. I hoped.

I was scared to have a discussion, fearful that it would get into an argument and so I've reached a stage that I was willing not to engage at all.

It's my opinion that we should not discuss or debate ideas or thoughts that we are unwilling to change. If we Believe, we don't Think. And then there's nothing that will change our mind. We may make claims such as "I have an open mind. Show me the data. And I'll change my mind." And then when someone shows us the data that indicates that we are wrong, we bring in other arguments such as the objectivity of the data, the bias of the author, the political leaning of the media, ...



When I came across "How to disagree productively and find common ground", it was ironically timely.

The talk made me change my mind. About how I should think about sensitive conversations (aka Debates), and how I should handle those.
 
The complete talk and the ideas that Julia Dhar discusses are very powerful and the things that stood out for me were:
- Debating ideas rather than discussing identity.
- Humility of Uncertainty. Opening ourselves to the possibility that we may be wrong.
- Practicing "Intellectual Humility", a skill that enables one to be capable of evaluating a broad range of evidence in a more objective manner and become less defensive.

How to disagree productively and find common ground
Julia Dhar



The major takeaway is that in order to have a meaningful debate we must ask and answer:
What is it you have changed your mind about ? And why ?
and
Pre commit to the possibility of being wrong ? And have an idea of what it would take to change our mind ?

And as luck would have it, there was another equally powerful idea and talk of getting people of different persuasions into a conversation and ...

How to lead a conversation between people who disagree
Eve Pearlman



Sunday, June 14, 2020

In Quarantine

Yesterday I dropped Freia to her New York apartment. 3 months after she was supposed to move. The COVID-19 stay-at-home that forced us to be indoors, had a silver lining. I got to spend 3 months of quality time with Freia. And learnt more about her than I had in the preceding 25 years. I had a great time enjoying the amazing food she made, the enjoyable choice of shows and movies she projected and the casual yet meaningful conversations we had.

And this blog is for her. And by her. Not 1. Not 2. But 3. Enjoy ! You can always follow her on tumlr



freia in quarantine

American History Recommendations from Twitter
  •     A People’s History of the United States
  •     Independence Lost
  •     A People’s history of the American Empire (graphic novel)
  •     March Trilogy (graphic novel)
  •     Democracy in America
  •     Cane River
  •     Lies my teacher told me
  •     The warmth of other suns
  •     Black Against Empire
  •     Stamped from the Beginning
  •     The History of White People
  •     Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America
  •     Racial Politics in American Cities
  •     And the Band Played On
  •     1491
  •     Age of Fracture
  •     Medical Apartheid
  •     Indigenous Peoples History of the United States
  •     Black Women’s History of the United States
  •     These Truths
  •     Killers of the flower moon
  •     We Were Eight Years in Power



a tale of four cities

i grew up in mumbai, the largest city in india. i loved living in a city and always missed it when we went to visit family in smaller towns.

one of the earliest memories i have, or maybe it’s a reconstructed memory from my parents telling me the story, is that when i was 3 or 4 years old we went to visit family in a smaller town and i complained to my mom that i could not sleep because it was “too quiet.” the darkness terrified me as a kid used to cars and lights.

i was lucky to have traveled quite a bit as a kid, and my favorite parts of these trips were always cities. i never cared much for nature, but i loved being able to try street food or go to dense shopping areas.

we visited san francisco and los angeles when i was 8, because i had family in both cities at the time. i am told i didnt like san francisco (too cold, water tasted weird) and i loved los angeles (disneyland). i visited new york twice, when i was 14 and again when i was 15. i fell in love. the city felt familiar to me, like mumbai in many ways, but more organized. i remember distinctly when my uncle took us to mamoun’s falefel, near nyu. i remember thinking - wow people go to college here? how lucky. i hadn’t yet realized that it had little to do with luck and everything to do with money and privilege.

and then, i was the “lucky” one. i moved to the us, specifically new york when i was 18, to go to college at nyu. from the very first day i felt immediately at home. the subway felt navigable enough, and i was finally able to do whatever i wanted. that first year felt like magic, and i remember every part of it. taking ridiculously long walks late at night just because, refusing to do anything touristy because i now lived in new york, feeling deeply homesick and going to jackson heights for a taste of home.

i studied computer science, and was lucky again to go out west every summer for an internship in the bay area. the summers were fun and packed with activity, and i loved being in san francisco where everyone, like me, loved tech. i missed my friends in new york, but i always knew that i was going home in a few months.

then in senior year, i had a decision to make. i had an opportunity in san francisco that i knew i couldn’t refuse, but i just didn’t want to leave new york. but i decided to prioritize opportunity over location, so i signed on to move. the last few months in new york were brutal. not because they were bad, but because they were great. i had the best streak of subway luck i had ever had in my 4 years, the summer was amazing and ending too quickly. my last day in the city was very emotional - i was leaving behind people i loved and a city i just didn’t want to leave. i threw myself a goodbye party, promising everyone that i would be back.

and then i moved to san francisco. i spent two years in sf, and for the most part i enjoyed them. i met a ton of people, the job was the right choice, and i had a lot of great experiences. but in parallel, i kept visiting new york, every 3 or 4 months for work or fun. and every time i landed at the airport, i knew i still wanted to move back. this was no secret, and though i hope i wasn’t obnoxious about it, i remember distinctly once in a meeting where after i had been in new york for memorial day, a colleague said in a very aggressive tone “how was your weekend in new york?  i don’t understand why people move to california if they hate it so much. why not go back to where you came from?” maybe i was more obnoxious than i realized.

last year, i had an opportunity to join a startup in la, a city i had only been to once before for a weekend. i liked it that one time, but i didn’t know anything about it. i also had a few opportunities to move back to new york, but they did’t seem like the right opportunities, so i moved to la. opportunity over location.

in many ways i loved living in la. i lived right by the beach, and i got more sun than i ever have. but i was also deeply lonely. a month into living in la, i had a work trip to new york. when i flew back to la, i felt the worst whiplash and had a major depressive reaction. i knew what i wanted, but it seemed insane to quit a job i enjoyed a month in, because of a fun weekend in new york.

i knew nobody there but my coworkers, i also happened to be traveling a lot and spent very little time actually in la outside of work, and had a lot of friends visit me. all of this helped me distract from how lonely i felt, but when it became clear that things with the job weren’t going to work out, my impulse was to leave the city as well.

i spent some time thinking about where i wanted to go when i left. i could go back to san francisco, where i still think most of the best jobs for me are. but i decided that i would not prioritize opportunity this time, but prioritize my friends and family.

so i flew back, two and a half years after my overly dramatic departure, and made it back. i stayed with my dad in connecticut and found myself an apartment and got the keys, and in my classic dramatic fashion i almost cried. this all happened right before lockdown, so i’ve had to push my physical move a little further, but i am even more excited to be back.

my dad tells me that i’ve talked about wanting to live in new york from a very young age. i attribute this to having read the devil wears prada far too early on. but i still feel that same silly excitement about the city, and while i can’t quite articulate why, it’s the place that feels the most like home.



what do you do?

recently, i was asked to write my job title and professional bio for something for the first time since i didn’t have an obvious one. as much as any young ‘ambitious’ person in tech, i have tied my identity to my job for basically as long as i can remember working. i never felt bad about that, and still don’t, but i’m starting to think differently about it.

my twitter bio says “just vibing,” and a few weeks or months (who knows really) a friend messaged me saying “hey so are you working anywhere or are you actually just vibing?” i laughed very hard and saved a screenshot to my favorites folder.

since leaving my job and moving cross country back to new york in early feb, i hadn’t really “announced” (lmao) “my next move” to the internet, which was obviously intentional for someone who spends as much time performing online as i do. the reason for the lack of announcement was because there was nothing to announce, i had no plan or idea of what i would be doing next, and the last thing i wanted was to deal with the questions of overly familiar internet strangers.

when i worked at twitter, it was my entire life. my workdays, my weekends, my whole personality and identity. it was all consuming and i wouldn’t have done it any other way. it left me with many deep relationships that i continue to cherish, and also with a lot of messy feelings i’m still working through. when i left for  a startup, it was similar, where i suddenly felt entirely immersed in the company’s world. i loved and am grateful for both those roles. but in both cases towards what turned out to be the end of the role, i started feeling a nagging restlessness, that told me it was time to move on.

i spent some time earlier this year job hunting, and as embarrassing as it is to admit, one of the factors i weighed was “how would i feel saying that i work at XYZ company.” i used it as a proxy for how i felt about the company, but i would be lying to myself if i said i don’t also earnestly care what people think.

eventually, i decided that i didn’t want to work at any of those companies, because they just didn’t feel right. it’s been interesting to somewhat unintentionally fall into a position of not having a concrete title and job that defines my identity, and navigate that after living a life where my linkedin was my whole personality.

the short answer to the question of what i’m doing is that i’m contracting full time with an awesome company, and trying out one off freelance things. the longer answer is that i’m trying to figure out how to build a life where i can have a setup that pays me well and helps me save money and build personal financial runway, while i also spend the remainder of the year thinking about what it would look like to work on my own company and what kind of company that might be, or if i want to join another company and what kind of company that might be.

i feel very lucky to be able to try something like this at such a precarious time. i can take the financial “risk,” am not on a visa, i don’t have debt or dependents. there are downsides compared to a stable job of course - the money itself, benefits and stability to name 3 hugely important things. but frankly, as cliche as it sounds, i’ve never been more happy or fulfilled in my work, and i finally feel after much restlessness that i am working towards the kind of career that feels right to me right now.
 

Sunday, June 7, 2020

Black Lives Matter!

As a person of color, I've experienced racism in almost each of the 50+ countries I've visited. However, these have mostly been subtle and have not impacted me in any meaningful way. I guess this is also because I've been fortunate to have been privileged. First as an Officer in the Merchant Navy and then as part of Management in an IT company.

While I thought I understood Racism, it was not until a few years ago when the Black Lives Matter movement started that I began to realize that I did not at all understand it. Neither the acts. Or their impact.

A few years ago, Freia tried to explain it to me. And instead of listening, I tried to explain and effectively dilute the issue, in my mind.


It's only in the last 2 weeks, that I've come to realize how wrong I was. And how much of a systemic issue this is. Especially for those who in addition are also economically challenged.

And this week there were peace and protest marches in all 50 States. Yes! For the first time ever all 50 States agreed on something. And that was that "Black Lives Matter"

In addition to the chilling videos of the death of George Floyd, Trevor Noah's monologue on the subject hit home. And Hard.

George Floyd, Minneapolis Protests, Ahmaud Arbery & Amy Cooper
The Daily Social Distancing Show
Trevor Noah



I have subsequently tried and will continue to get a better perspective as well as figure out ways in which I can help, even if in small ways. I believe that if enough of us acknowledge the issue and set out to make a difference, it will make a DIFFERENCE!

Like many organizations that have acknowledged the issue, TED too has created a playlist of Talks. Please do take time out and watch them.

https://www.ted.com/playlists/250/talks_to_help_you_understand_r




Sunday, May 31, 2020

Can tech Help during the Pandemic?

It seems like when there's a Global Crisis, tech can help. And it requires the 2 largest tech companies to come together. Apple and Google. Here's how.


How tech companies can help combat the pandemic and reshape public health

Karen DeSalvo, the chief health officer at Google, explains the partnership between big tech and public health in slowing the spread of COVID-19 -- and discusses a new contact tracing technology recently rolled out by Google and Apple that aims to ease the burden on health workers and provide scientists critical time to create a vaccine. (This virtual conversation, hosted by current affairs curator Whitney Pennington Rodgers and head of TED Chris Anderson, was recorded on May 27, 2020.)



Sunday, May 24, 2020

The Global Economy is Shut Down! What's Next?

The coronavirus pandemic has resulted in stay-at-home across the globe and businesses closed across the world. This kind of "Global Lockdown" has never happened before in world history.

This extremely interesting talk gives a world view of the global economy, what we can expect, and how global economies and international bodies have responded and are expected.


How to rebuild the global economy

The coronavirus pandemic shattered the global economy. To put the pieces back together, we need to make sure money is going to the countries that need it the most -- and that we rebuild financial systems that are resilient to shocks, says Kristalina Georgieva, managing director of the International Monetary Fund. She takes us inside the massive economic stimulus efforts leading the world toward recovery and renewal and discusses what it will take for countries to emerge from this "great transformation" even stronger than before. (This virtual conversation, hosted by head of TED Chris Anderson and current affairs curator Whitney Pennington Rodgers, was recorded on May 18, 2020.)


Sunday, May 17, 2020

Do we Lie?

While most of us are aware that we sometimes lie, what we call a white lie, I was surprised that that's not true. We lie a whole lot more.

And now I know how to spot a liar, so be careful when you meet with me. Unless you've watched this talk too.


How to spot a liar
Pamela Meyer


On any given day we're lied to from 10 to 200 times, and the clues to detect those lies can be subtle and counter-intuitive. Pamela Meyer, author of Liespotting, shows the manners and "hotspots" used by those trained to recognize deception -- and she argues honesty is a value worth preserving.


Sunday, May 10, 2020

Can we help choose our future?

The last few weeks I've been focussing on the pandemic. And felt that we must not forget another equally serious issue. The Climate. And the Future.

And Tom has a great idea. I liked it. And maybe you will too.


How to shift your mindset and choose your future
When it comes to big life problems, we often stand at a crossroads: either believe we're powerless against great change, or we rise to meet the challenge. In an urgent call to action, political strategist Tom Rivett-Carnac makes the case for adopting a mindset of "stubborn optimism" to confront climate change -- or whatever crisis may come our way -- and sustain the action needed to build a regenerative future. As he puts it: "Stubborn optimism can fill our lives with meaning and purpose."


Sunday, May 3, 2020

Different cultures respond differently even to pandemics

I am currently in the US and here the political establishment is blaming China for the Pandemic impact which has been devastating. Some States have even sued China for damages.

What surprised me however was that many ordinary people here, most Republicans, a fair amount of  Democrats and even some healthcare professionals including Physicians, seem to believe that somehow China is responsible for the pandemic impacting the US. And that the US response has been PERFECT!

While I don't subscribe to this and have not found anyone who has any rationale behind their beliefs, unfortunately, perception is reality.

The way I see it is that China has done everything that any other country where a virus would begin would do. And this is borne out by history. While they should and could have done more, what right does any country have to expect from others what they themselves would not do? And the bigger question is, what would have changed and how?

This TED talk by Chinese author Huang Hung throws some light on the difference in response of the two countries based on the difference in values.


How American and Chinese values shaped the coronavirus response

To combat COVID-19, countries have enforced city-wide shutdowns, stay-at-home orders and mask mandates -- but the reaction (and adherence) to these rules has differed markedly in the East and West. In conversation with TED's head of curation Helen Walters, writer and publisher Huang Hung sheds light on how Chinese and American cultural values shaped their responses to the outbreak -- and provides perspective on why everyone needs to come together to end the pandemic.



The Chinese state media released a propaganda video and while its propaganda, I do think it is funny and at a macro level not inaccurate. Have a Laugh!