Sunday, August 27, 2017

Young Achiever

Freia and I were watching an Ellen clip of an interview with a prodigy. That's when Freia mentioned that a friend of hers had appeared on the Ellen show. And she showed me the clip on YouTube.


The person was Sara Sakowitz. And it became quickly apparent that Sara too was a prodigy who at 20 had achieved more than most of us manage in a lifetime.


I won't bother trying to explain what she does. I'll allow you to discover it yourself.

Sara on Ellen



A Young Scientist's Perspective

 

Sara on 22 under 22
https://22under22.hercampus.com/2016/sara-sakowitz

And finally you can check out Sara's own website
http://sarasakowitz.com/

Sunday, August 20, 2017

Should we Tolerate the Intolerant ?

The last couple of years, there's been significant number of people and media India talking about "intolerance" becoming a part of an ugly side of Indian Society. While some part of the issues and incidents highlighted are political in nature, I think that in several cases, unfortunately there is merit to these allegations.


What is even more concerning is that this phenomenon seems to be rearing its ugly head across the globe. In Asia, Europe, America, ...


A few days ago, it came to the fore in Charlottesville, US.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/13/us/charlottesville-virginia-overview.html?mcubz=0

And this is when it becomes important for us to understand the Paradox of Tolerance and make a decision. Who are we and what do we want to do?


The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.


Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.

- In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.


We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.

- Karl R. Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/25998-the-so-called-paradox-of-freedom-is-the-argument-that-freedom


For the audio-visual minded, here's an explanation of the paradox.
What is PARADOX OF TOLERANCE?



All of this leads to a fundamental question. Why should we be just tolerant. Can we not be accepting. And like most thoughts, someone, somewhere has already answered it. Extremely well.


Tolerance is a dirty word
Andrew Sayer - TEDxSemesterAtSea



And while we are on paradoxes, it would be great to check out 25 of them in 6 minutes.
25 CRAZIEST Paradoxes That Will Blow Your Mind

Sunday, August 13, 2017

Muktangan - New Model of Education

Recently Reia spent 2 weeks volunteering at a public school run by "Muktangan". She enjoyed her time there and was very excited by the time she spent at the Muktanagan school and with the kids. Her last day was supposed to be Tuesday, while the other volunteers were to be there till the end of the week. The kids requested Reia to come back for the other days, since they had not completed a "Thank You" card that they were making for her. She was touched. And of course, went back for the rest of the week.


While sharing her experiences with us, one thing she mentioned stood out to me. "I wish my teachers used these techniques while teaching us". Considering that she was part of the privileged lot who went to a private school, the comment about a public school stood out. More so, since the public school system in India unfortunately does not  have a good reputation and the dream of most parents is to put their children in private schools even when they may not be able to afford the significantly higher fees.

I asked for some examples and she gave me 2. I loved both of them. The first was the methodology used to quieten the class. As with all children the class is typically noisy when a teacher enters. But unlike most schools, they do not ask them to be quiet or some such in an angry tone. Instead they draw a circle on the board called the circle of silence, and as the circle is completed, the kids who are engaged in the drawing quieten down until there's complete silence when the circle is completed.


The second is getting kids back on track when during the class they get distracted. The teacher starts singing, "Are you listening, are you listening.". And the distracted kids are suddenly engaged and reply in unison, "Yes, we are, yes we are". These are seemingly simple things. And yet not so commonly used. Like Reia, I too wish my teachers used some of these techniques.


They adopt and use what they call a "New Model of Education".

"Muktangan is a new model of education providing quality, child-centred, inclusive English-medium schooling to thousands of underprivileged children in Mumbai.  We are truly "education for the community by the community," integrating the training of teachers from the same neighbourhoods as the students, creating empowered change agents.Check it out."


No amount of admiration for the founders is sufficient. Elizabeth and Sunil Mehta started Muktangan in 2003. And what started as a small initiative has grown into a major success that has brought quality education to tens of thousands of kids.


And in addition to that they are also great people. Although I've not had the privilege of meeting them, Reia is full of praise for the dedicated couple and went so far as to say, "Sunil is the nicest, funniest, person I've met and reminds me of Daddy". And no, the Daddy is not me. She's referring to
my Dad, her granddad who she adored.

On behalf of Reia and the thousands of children whose lives you'll have touched, to Elizabeth and Sunil, a BIG THANK YOU.

You can learn more about Muktangan, their mission and what they do at their website.
http://muktanganedu.org/ 

Sunday, August 6, 2017

What just hapenned to the Bitcoin ?

You may have come across news that Bitcoin was going to be forked and that a new currency "Bitcoin Cash" was being introduced. The change was scheduled to go live on August 1. And it did.

Several questions immediately come to mind. "What's a fork ?"; "What happens to my Bitcoins?"; "What's Bitcoin Cash". Since I knew nothing about any of this, I looked to the experts and they were able to answer all of the questions. I'll allow them to answer your questions.

August 1 BITCOIN FORK Explained!
BTC and BTC Cash Explained! What Should You Do?





The mainstream media too covered the event. For the lay-person. Here's NBC News' take.
Why Did Bitcoin ‘Fork’ Today and What is ‘Bitcoin Cash?’
http://www.nbcnews.com/business/consumer/why-bitcoin-forking-today-what-bitcoin-cash-n788581


Still want to know more ?

Bitcoin Fork Explained | When Will Bitcoin Fork?

 


Every new event is a threat. And an opportunity. Here's a take on how you can capitalize on this opportunity. A bit late to capitalize, but interesting to know.

How To Capitalize on The Bitcoin Fork



And for those of you who are interested in a detailed explanation, this is a great video.

Bitcoin Fork? What is Bitcoin Cash? What should You do?


And for those who don't yet know what finally did happen, here's the good news. Everyone gained. Today Bitcoin (BTC) hit its all time high and was trading at US$ 3,255. Bitcoin Cash, the currency Bitcoin holders got at a 1:1 ratio was trading at US$ 218.96. A huge win-win for all crypto-currency holders and specifically Bitcoin holders.

Sunday, July 30, 2017

The paradox of choice


Every time I go to a restaurant, even a fast food restaurant, I feel overwhelmed. And struggle to make a choice. When its a place that needs choices within choices such as a Chipotle or Qdoba, I dread the experience. And thus end up almost never going to these places.

And so I was delighted when I came across the concept of the paradox of choice. Ironically its not new and even celebrated more than a decade a while ago. And, I'm still wondering how this eluded me for so long.


"The Paradox of Choice - Why More Is Less is a 2004 book by American psychologist Barry Schwartz. In the book, Schwartz argues that eliminating consumer choices can greatly reduce anxiety for shoppers.

Autonomy and Freedom of choice are critical to our well being, and choice is critical to freedom and autonomy. Nonetheless, though modern Americans have more choice than any group of people ever has before, and thus, presumably, more freedom and autonomy, we don't seem to be benefiting from it psychologically.
    — quoted from Ch.5, The Paradox of Choice, 2004"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Paradox_of_Choice



In a TED talk the author of the book, "Psychologist Barry Schwartz takes aim at a central tenet of western societies: freedom of choice. In Schwartz's estimation, choice has made us not freer but more paralyzed, not happier but more dissatisfied."

 
And 10 years after the book, Pacific Standard published an interview with the author.
"The Paradox of Choice, 10 Years Later
Paul Hiebert talks to psychologist Barry Schwartz about how modern trends—social media, FOMO, customer review sites—fit in with arguments he made a decade ago in his highly influential book, The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less.
https://psmag.com/social-justice/paradox-choice-barry-schwartz-psychology-10-years-later-96706

And several years later, I find that the paradox is alive and thriving, unbeknownst to many of us.



Sunday, July 23, 2017

India: Electing the President

The Presidential elections were held on 17 July 2017. On Thu, July 20, Ram Nath Kovind of the BJP was declared elected by over 65% of the votes.


During a conversation with a colleague on the results he mentioned in passing that the Presidential and Vice-Presidential elections in India are not based on the simple method of the winner being the person receiving the maximum number of votes, but was based on the concept of the person being elected needing to get at least 50% + 1 of the total valid votes. I was intrigued. I had no idea about this.

I did know that the elections were based on voting by elected members of the state and central legislative bodies, and that there was a different weightage to each of them. Naturally I looked a little more and what I found was interesting and intriguing.

The article that explains it best is one by India Today. Here's a summary from that article.

"
How does India elect its president? An in-depth guide
Dev Goswami
New Delhi, July 1, 2017



On July 17, 4,896 electors will cast a total of 10,98,903 votes to elect the next President of India.

The electors will include all elected Members of Legislative Assemblies and Members of Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha). People nominated to a state's legislative assembly or to the Rajya Sabha cannot vote in the Presidential election 2017.

The process for electing the President of India is quite unlike elections to the Lok Sabha or a state Legislative Assembly.
For example, each elector's vote is valued in hundreds - a vote cast by one Uttar Pradesh MLA, for example, will be valued at 208. The vote of a Member of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha) will be valued at 708.

But, it ensures that each state gets a fair say in the election, in proportion to its population, and that the candidate who is elected President is one who has the support of the majority of electors.



STEP 1: Nomination
Each candidate considering a run for the President of India's office were supposed to file their nominations by June 28. The candidates were also required to fork over Rs 15,000 as deposit and submit a signed list of 50 proposers and 50 seconders. The proposers and seconders can be any of the 4,896 electors eligible to vote in the Presidential election 2017.

An elector can only propose or second one candidate's name.



STEP 2: Voting
On July 17, all elected MLAs, in their respective state and union territory capitals, and all elected MPs, at Parliament, will be given ballot papers (green coloured for MPs and pink coloured for MLAs) to cast their vote. They will also be given special pens, which is the only instrument they can use to record their votes.

Each ballot paper will contain the name of all candidates who are contesting the Presidential election. The electors will proceed to indicate their preference for each candidate - marking '1' for the candidate they most prefer as President, '2' for the candidate who is their second preference, and so on.

An elector isn't required to mark preferences for all Presidential candidates. He/she has to only mark their first preference for their vote to be considered in the election.


STEP 3: Segregating ballot papers
On July 20, the Returning Office Anoop Mishra will verify all ballots and begin the counting process using the ballots that are valid.

The ballot papers will be taken up state-wise and allotted to each candidate's tray depending on whose name appears as the first preference. For example, if an MLA from Uttar Pradesh marks Ram Nath Kovind as his/her first preference that MLA's ballot paper will go to Kovind's tray.

Then the ballots papers of the Members of Parliament are similarly distributed. For example, all ballot papers of MPs who mark Meira Kumar as their first preference will go to Kumar's tray.



STEP 4: Counting votes
The total number of votes that a Presidential candidate garners is calculated by adding up the value of all the ballots in which a particular candidate receives a first preference.

The value of each ballot paper depends on who cast the votes. The ballot paper of a UP MLA will be valued at 208, of an Andhra Pradesh MLA at 159 and of an MLA from Sikkim at 7.

The value of the ballot paper of any MP (from Rajya Sabha or Lok Sabha) is 708. Adding up the value of each ballot paper that is in a candidate's tray gives the total number of votes polled for that candidate.



STEP 5: Deciding the winner
The winner of the Presidential election is not the person who gets the most number of votes, but the person who gets more votes than a certain quota.

The quota is decided by adding up the votes polled for each candidate, dividing the sum by 2 and adding '1' to the quotient.
The candidate who polls more votes than the quota is the winner. In case, no one gets more votes than the quota, then the candidate with the lowest number of votes is eliminated.

Then, the eliminated candidates' ballot papers are distributed between the remaining hopefuls based on those ballot papers' second preference choice. The process of counting the total votes for each candidate is then repeated to see if any one polls above the quota.

The process continues until someone's votes tally up to more than the quota, or until just one candidate is left after the constant eliminations, at which point that person is declared as the winner of the President of India.

You can read the entire article at:
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/how-india-elects-its-president/1/991893.html

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Au Revoir Mashable

This week was Freia's last week at Mashable. And the Mashable team made it memorable for her. Thank you @Mashable.


It seems to have been her most memorable internship stint thus far. She wrote quite a few articles. Good. Bad. And Ugly.

And here's my list of my favorite 10 articles.


10. A new Wikipedia-based text game is the perfect way to procrastinate
http://mashable.com/2017/06/30/wikipedia-the-text-adventure/#ZCc_m2hK2gqh


9. Take a virtual reality tour of the White House narrated by President Obama
http://mashable.com/2017/01/13/white-house-360-tour/#r_gCdBG1DqqR


8. The reason airlines mess up names with hyphens and apostrophes
http://mashable.com/2017/06/25/airlines-hyphenated-names/#TBq2h_mtDOqw


7. This weird gadget helps you have conversations privately in public places
http://mashable.com/2017/03/14/hushme-private-conversations-gadget/#q1TKutR_25qY


6. This guy built his own iPhone by buying parts in China
http://mashable.com/2017/04/12/scotty-allen-iphone-parts-china/#j6i4W0Pb2PqS



5. This teen's amazing DIY dress is ready to light up prom
http://mashable.com/2017/05/10/teen-adafruit-light-up-prom-dress/#hyufTLZJmqqG


4. Google's new feature wants to make you an art expert
http://mashable.com/2017/05/31/google-search-maps-art/#6jna7VX8MSqP


3. After 10 long years, I'm breaking up with Android
http://mashable.com/2017/07/14/why-im-buying-an-iphone/#V08eY65n2aqK


2. YouTube taught me more than college
http://mashable.com/2017/05/12/i-learned-more-from-youtube-than-professors/#TBq2h_mtDOqw


And my favorite.
1. Why WhatsApp and family go hand in hand for me